Snooker Cue Tip Brands (Elkmaster/Kamui etc.)

89.jpg

Formerly, I’ve looked at how the tip of a cue can make a difference when you are playing a shot. This looked at factors like size and density (click here to read that Short) and how they can impact a shot upon contact. If you are looking at replacing the tip on your cue and wondering how to choose from all the brands that are available, then hopefully this will be helpful for you.

Elkmaster

The most common/popular brand of cue tip, even among professionals. These tips can be ordered in batches so you’ll always have spares available should the situation arise. They are quite inexpensive compared to other brands. Elks generally fall on the softer end of the scale, allowing for comfortable gripping on the cue ball as well as ease when it comes to shaping. They will also require a bit of breaking in before getting comfortable and consistent results.

Due to Elks coming in batches, it can be tricky finding the perfect tip of out the bunch. This can often lead to heavy shaping and pressing before even using the tip to ensure it fits your specification/preference. There are such tips called Elkmaster Pros which are pressed and shaped to a better result than standard Elks, but I am not aware that these are actually any different in the manufacturing process i.e. they are handpicked out of an ordinary Elk batch. Blue Diamond is a brand that is characteristically similar to Elk, if it doesn’t meet your requirements.

Kamui

Chief rival to Elkmasters – Kamui offers an alternative to players who prefer the contact of a slightly harder tip. Kamui is more expensive and you are effectively ordering for a single piece, as opposed to receiving a batch with multiple tips. Kamui uses a higher quality leather so you don’t have to maintain them as much as an Elk - you can worry less about mushrooming or misshaping with a Kamui tip. John Higgins is a notable Kamui user.

Century

A brand of tip that is all about quality. If you want something that matches the class of the sport you play in, this is the one to get. Century uses a grading system to allow you to find the perfect density in your tip; G1-5 where the higher you go, the harder the tip. These tips are a little more expensive than Kamui’s but you receive four in a batch and shouldn’t need to worry too much about compressing them. Another thing to consider is that currently, they are only available in a 10mm configuration, so if you wanted something smaller and don’t want to take to slicing your expensive product, you may need to compromise or wait until Century start manufacturing a smaller tip.

Something to note is if you want a G5 graded tip, these do have to be custom made and are significantly more expensive than other tips. So bear that in mind if you need a hard tip. Century is a brand of tip endorsed by Mark Selby.

Fun Fact: According to Century’s Amazon seller page, Mark Williams used a Century tip when he won the World Championship in 2018!

Talisman

Available in soft, medium or hard variants the Talisman tips are close in price to the Century brand. Talisman tips are generally harder than other brands so soft and medium will be sufficient for most users. Often complemented as a great all-round tip which doesn’t require much breaking in or maintenance, this is a great choice for a reasonable all-round player.

It’s quite difficult to compare tips unless you have extensively used products across all brands. Most people will have a certain preference when it comes to size and density but the main differences across manufacturers is the time it takes to break in/shape a new tip and how often it will need to be replaced. What do you think? What’s your tip brand of choice? Feel free to inform on other brands that were not mentioned above (Black Heart – but they seem to be quite scarce).


51.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: Types of Snooker Cues: A Guide for Buying Cues

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!

Snooker: The Miss Rule

88.jpg

In September 1995, the rule book was amended to introduce the wildly positively received ‘foul and a miss’ call. Since its early beginnings to present day, this rule has brought more attention and dispute than perhaps any other aspect of the modern game. It’s been 25 years living with miss rule – has it made things better?

Prior to foul and a miss, players were able to deliberately play foul shots with no real consequence in order to leave the cue ball in a safe position. Instead, they would sacrifice penalty points to their opponent as opposed to an opportunity where they could win the frame. Foul and a miss sounds pretty fair now, right?

However, problems occur if a player relies solely on miss points to get themselves into, or even win a frame after their opposition have made a sizeable contribution. A snooker could be laid and all of a sudden, there’s an extra 30 minutes added to the frame. This leads to the additional criticism of how it affects the tempo and entertainment value of the match, particularly for those who tune in occasionally and see a player still attempting the same shot.

There have been times when the miss rule had to be amended such as the 2009 UKC incident between Higgins and O’Sullivan where ROS snookered himself on the colours and accidently nudged a red before taking a shot, thereby cancelling the miss call by Jan Verhaas. Due to the red now being the playable colour on the next shot as opposed to a nominated colour, the rules were shortly after revised to cover rare circumstances such as these.

The other issue can arise when misses are called even if a players attempt at an escape was performed sufficiently not to warrant the call. So let’s say someone shot a three or four cushion escape but very narrowly missed their target yet is still called a miss. Misses are not called if the referee judges that the player played the shot to the best of their ability and got as close as they possibly could have contacting the object ball.

Although, what is often the case is that when a player is trying to make a tricky escape requiring multiple cushions, they are trying to also play safe. Which is where referees are in a tough spot because if there is an easier one-cushion escape available they kind of have to call the miss. Referees have to try and manage these situations along with its ruling to ensure fair calls are made – which can be the trickiest part of their job along with accurate re-spotting. The most recent foul/no miss call that I recall being fair was between Trump and Robertson in their epic Champion of Champions final overseen by Desi Bozhilova.

It’s strongly voiced by many which side of the coin they lie but even when players were consulted about it, while not entirely happy about it, they couldn’t think of a better alternative and stated the rule should probably remain. There may be a better solution out there that exists which we won’t know about for a while but in the meantime, it is pretty rare that exceptional circumstances occur which reignites the spark to debate this hot topic.

I do think referees should be given more authority to use their judgement and discretion to be a little more lenient when calling misses. If a player barely misses their object ball off a three or four cushion escape, misses shouldn’t be called because misses likely wouldn’t be called if it were a one-cushion escape – in the case of a full-table snooker anyway where the nap of the cushions can be a factor.

There should also be more care taken when replacing balls in a foul and a miss situation. Considering the technology available, there should be a far better job done by the markers when aiding the referee in replacing the balls. It happens far too often when balls are replaced and the before/after pictures are like two separate tables. Commentators are quick to commend a good job done when correctly replaced but quite frequently, they just have to keep quiet when they see the glaring differences between the before/after pictures.

What’s your thoughts on the foul and a miss rule? Should it stay or do you know of a better alternative?


Like this Short? Click here to read: Are Best-Of-7 Matches Too Short?

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!

76.jpg

Present vs. Future? Players Championship Final 2020 – Shorts Thoughts

87.jpg

The second event in the Coral Cup series took place which involved the Top 16 players in the one-year ranking list. Ultimately, the battle for the top prize whittled down to the current World Champion, Judd Trump and the young 20-year old prospect, Yan Bingtao. A showcase of two players that possess the same raw talent but are in very different stages of their careers; it was always going to be a final worth watching.

Breakdown

Bingtao did well to capitalise off a Trump miss with a break of 70 however, he still lost the frame as Trump got the snooker he required along with a free ball. This was short-lived as a break of 55 got Bingtao over the line in Frame 2. The next couple of frames belonged to Trump as he made a 75 and won the scrappier affair in Frame 4 to lead at the midsession interval.

Relatively loose safety is a pattern that emerged for Bingtao throughout the match as a double kiss allowed Trump to extend his lead with a 122 century break. Even in the frames that required a bit more safety and reds were scattered on the table, Trump’s skill was able to keep his opponent at bay, much like in Frame 6. A brilliant opening pot out of the jaws of the left corner pocket by Trump and a break of 75 further lengthened his lead to 6-1. This could have been 7-1 but an unfortunate in-off for Trump led to Bingtao bouncing back with a 95 to end the opening session.

The bounce back continued as Bingtao started off the evening session as best he could have asked for as he claimed Frames 9 and 10. Unfortunately for him, Trump managed to regain his authority in the match. Safeties that would normally be considered ‘good enough’, weren’t effective at keeping Trump away as he blasted a 108 and 68 in the following two frames.

Bingtao wasn’t able to punish Trump’s mistakes in Frame 13 as he missed a black off the spot. Instead, he left Trump in amongst the rest of the balls as he clinched the frame to go one away from victory. And victory was just what the doctor ordered for Trump as breaks of 36 and 60 helped him secure his second Players Championship title.

Afterthoughts

Even though the overall final was a good standard, it was clear as to the differences between the two players. When the semi-finals between Murphy and Bingtao were taking place, I perhaps selfishly wanted Murphy to win just because I think he would have competed better against Trump in the final, particularly if he brought out his Welsh Open form. However, Bingtao cruised through Murphy with an ease and 100% long pot success (14/14) that quickly dismissed any reservation I had.

Bingtao had his moments in this final, particularly as he came out firing in the evening session and his long potting had significantly improved. His chances to get a foothold in the final fell at the start where Trump wasn’t at top gear just yet. He would have relished some of the opportunities he was afforded if he was on the practice table. If he was able to focus on his own ability as opposed to his opponent and the occasion he was in, it would have been a closer match.

What I really admire about Bingtao is his maturity for his age and the amount of talent he has on the snooker table. He isn’t arrogant and he’s aware of what he needs to do to perform well in the sport. It’s easy to forget that he is just 20 years old and has already appeared in 3 ranking finals (winning one of them at Riga). But when everyone places such high expectation on him as being a prodigy, this is precisely the kind of experience he needed which is why Bingtao won’t (and shouldn’t) be disappointed at his performance in this final.

Playing the best in the world when they are performing at their best will set the benchmark for Bingtao and give him a standard to aspire to. He played against an opponent that was in his position near 10 years ago and is now starting to reap the rewards. Bingtao has done very well to stake his position in the Top 16 and if he continues ascending as he is, he will definitely be the player everyone expects of him in the next 5-10 years.

I find myself running out of things to say about Trump but then he goes and achieves things or plays shots that continue to take the words out of all our mouths. Still proving himself as the undisputed best in the world, Trump bags his 16th ranking title and becomes the fifth person to win 5 ranking titles in a season. With three tournaments remaining and Trump running the show the way he is, it’s quite likely this will be beaten and he will cast a shadow over the rest of the greats.

He’s too good. He has no weakness. Many questioned his nerve and character, even while he’s been doing all this winning, but Trump continues to amaze as he produced the best pressure clearance all season in his semi-final decider against Maguire. He’s acquired a confidence with his string of success which puts him in a complete league of his own with the other players running a completely different race. What will he do next?


83.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: Murphy’s Sprint! Welsh Open Final 2020 – Shorts Thoughts

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!

History of Pot Black

86.jpg

Some may remember, but I reckon there’s a significant portion of viewers who are only vaguely aware of Pot Black and the important role it played in getting snooker on the map in the late 60s/early 70s. Let’s roll back the years and learn a little more about the phenomenon that catapulted the sport of snooker to great heights and paved the way for the game as we know it today.

In 1967, BBC began colour-broadcasts and were still looking for programming that would benefit from this new use of colour. Fast forward to 1969 and the first iteration of Pot Black (commissioned by Sir David Attenborough), snooker had gone from a minor sport to an experience that resonated with many fans and viewers. And what would better benefit from the use of colour technology than a sport where commentary formerly involved describing to listeners how each ball was a differing shade of grey.

Speaking of commentary, Pot Black was cast by the one and only Ted Lowe. BBC producer Phil Lewis contacted Lowe and asked him to gather players and arrange the series for broadcast. Lewis was certain at the time of the name ‘Pot Black’ which Lowe was hesitant about due to the lack of ‘snooker’, but continued with the necessary preparations so he can finally get the game on television.

Along with its conception was the approach to snooker decorum where players wore the traditional, smart clothing that we are used to seeing today; emulating that of Joe Davis, who was a long-time hero of Lowes.

Prior to the light bulb moment that was Pot Black, snooker was just a niche activity that didn’t really have a place yet. It was mainly an activity indulged by gentries/nobles or those in run-down billiard halls. Lowe stated that the programme helped bring the game into the homes of millions of viewers in between those two classes. And that’s exactly what it did. Snooker was put on the map.

The format of the tournament generally followed a one-frame shootout style, including the final. Depending on the year, between 6 and 16 players were involved and the show was broadcast on a weekly half-an-hour basis, broadcasting one match per episode. It was much like an episode of your favourite drama or late night chat show that you would tune into every week; along with the drama and comedy that came with the players involved in Pot Black. The whole tournament was often filmed in the course of a day.

It was risky for the players involved in the tournament as Pot Black was the main form of snooker that was shown on television. Ray Reardon, who happened to win the first Pot Black, shared some of these concerns as reputations were determined by a one-frame shootout; stating those who lost often struggled to even find exhibition work afterwards.

Despite its tremendous success, Pot Black only ran until 1986 (with a few revivals in the 90s and 00s) where mainstream professional snooker took its place in TV coverage. Without Pot Black, the whole landscape of snooker may be completely different. Who knows if many of the success stories we’ve seen in snooker would have still happened if it weren’t for Pot Black? It may be a time that most will have very few memories of (or none at all), but it’s certainly something that will never be forgotten in snooker as time goes on.

Fun fact: Ronnie O’Sullivan and Stephen Hendry have never won Pot Black (not including Junior Pot Black). Steve Davis has won four times (82, 83, 91, and 93).


59.jpg

Like this Short? Click here to read: History of the UK Championship

Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!