Snooker is a very traditional sport in that changes aren’t made as frequently as in other sports, primarily when it comes to innovating the equipment that we see. The most recent evolution of the sport involved the introduction of Taom chalk, which has the effect of reducing kicks. But not all players have adopted this new method. Recently, we’ve heard a lot of talk about changing the ferrule of the cue, and whether it has any validity in improving the shot.
Initially, let’s explain why the ferrule is necessary for the cue in the first place. In short, the ferrule protects the tip end of the cue from splitting, due to the continuous impact it receives. Historically, the ferrule had been made from brass which players have gotten accustomed to given how they rarely change cues over their careers. However, it has been discussed that a change in material may be one of positive change for players to consider.
But why titanium? Compared to brass, titanium is a lighter but stronger metal which has the effect of reducing deflection (or ‘throw’) of the cue when playing with side. This is achieved via the lighter weight of titanium, meaning that when the cue ball is struck, less force is going through it as would be the case with a brass cue. At least, in theory anyway. You often hear commentators mention how snooker is a fractions game, and you’re dealing with fractional differences in weight when changing ferrules, but the concept still applies.
Titanium is also a high strength metal, so it should have improved durability compared to brass. Even though professionals rarely change cue over their careers, they do change tips more often. Frequent changing of tips (and differing installation techniques) means that brass ferrules deteriorate and corrode quicker over time. When tips are installed, the sides are often brushed in order to line the tip with the shaft of the cue, which negatively impacts the ferrule. A titanium ferrule wouldn’t be impacted as much and would require less maintenance over time.
But is there any merit to this vital component change? And does it result in a better shot? That comes down to the individual. Jimmy White mentioned that shots are easier with a titanium ferrule but it came with a learning curve. If professionals are used to playing shot and accounting for a certain amount of side or deflection, it may be more difficult than expected for them to get used to a new formula. Although, it could help reduce the possibility of playing shots with unwanted side, which is something often seen with long pots.
Ronnie O’Sullivan makes an interesting point in that improvement is more about technique and timing as opposed to finding improvements in external factors. This is contrasting to what John Higgins thinks of titanium ferrules (which he has recently adopted), where he suggested that a number of little things that can lead to an improvement is always helpful. However, O’Sullivan did state that he was open minded about trying a change in ferrule in the future if he felt he required it.
What do you think? Have you tried playing with a titanium ferrule? Do you think there is a case to be made for applying this sort of change to a snooker cue? Let me know in the comments!
Like this Short? Click here to read: The Importance of Snooker Cues
Have an idea for a Short post? Feel free to get in touch using the social media links below! Thanks for reading!
